Last night I saw the excellent Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid for the first time. There’s a lot of economics in that movie, with several instances of the “hold-up problem”.
For instance, when Butch Cassidy finds out the expensive lengths the train company is going to in order to stop he and Sundance from robbing them, he identifies and laments a pareto improving road not taking.:
“A set-up like that costs more than we ever took…If he’d just pay me what he’s spending to make me stop robbing him, I’d stop robbing him.”
This is a lesson in the limitations of the Coase theorem, especially when one party has shows a willingness to break the law. Reputation and trust matter for effective contracts.
Later Butch wants, and in fact tries, to make a bargain with the government, offering to fight in the Spanish-American war and stop his criminal ways if all their past crimes will be forgiven. Again, the reputation and the commitment problem prevent a pareto improving outcome.
In the literature on the hold-up problem, vertical integration is one proposed solution, which is exactly what Butch and Sundance attempt. They get a job for a company as security, stopping robbers like themselves. This solution fails because of their preferences; they don’t like to kill people. Security requires more violence than robbery because when you’re a robber you’re can make credible threats that actually prevent violence (“don’t move or I’ll shoot!”), and so you can avoid actually killing people. When you’re on the security side, once someone has decided to rob you they have already decided that the level of violence you are implicitly threatening is not enough to stop them, and so you have to use more violence than they were expecting to stop them.
To avoid being arrested Butch and Sundance move to Bolivia, and this is where they began working as security. The irony is that had they been working as security in the United States, their reputations as excellent gunmen would potentially have made their threats successful so they wouldn’t have had to use violence to stop robbers.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Sunday ~ March 14th, 2010 at 10:08 am
teageegeepea
Nick Szabo argues against the Coase theorem here.
Tuesday ~ March 16th, 2010 at 11:50 pm
James D Robinson
Perhaps the most interesting movie review I have ever read. You might have another budding career! And I completely concur with the analysis, as well. By the way, love that movie.
Wednesday ~ March 17th, 2010 at 10:04 am
Verities and Vagaries » Blog Archive » Morning Consitutional – Wednesday, 17 March 2010 -
[…] The economics of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. […]
Wednesday ~ March 17th, 2010 at 7:17 pm
iPad Links: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 « Mike Cane's iPad Test
[…] “Rocky” Underdog Origin a Studio Myth Milgram: TV show panel agrees to electrocute man to death The Economics of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid Filmspiration – The Only Successful Videogame Movie Ever Paradox of Choice: Buying Shampoo The […]
Wednesday ~ April 14th, 2010 at 5:18 pm
If You Work at CNN, You’ve Got to Know Your Stans » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog
[…] Adam Ozimek on the economics of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance […]