I’ve been playing with the JOLTS data and I don’t have anything too too solid to report but I did want to reinforce some of my earlier points about how different the US economy as a whole is from the economy we have in our minds.
We usually think of a worker as a breadwinning head household in a career job. He or she has a steady life that may be rocked by recession. However, one of our most job heavy sectors is Leisure and Hospitality. Look at its basic dynamics

Its quite large at nearly 10% of all jobs. Its fast growing generally. Was one of the few sectors to show increased employment from when the recession ended and it recent months may be growing faster than at any time during the last recover.
In addition look how dominate it is in terms of overall job growth. Here are the12 month moving averages.

Currently the 12 month moving average of all job growth is around 150K, suggesting that nearly 1/5 net new jobs is Leisure and Hospitality.
Generally speaking this is a trend I would expect to continue as the End of Retail is combined with increasing income inequality. We should expect low skilled workers to become increasingly concentrated in direct service jobs like hot food and drinks.
Any one one of the points I wanted to make is that despite the huge job losses associated with the recession, there were not actually many layoffs or discharges in this sector. Here are the JOLTS data

If anything layoffs and discharges seemed to ease during the last downturn. I think what we are looking at is simply an incredibly dynamic sector of the economy in terms of workforce.
Rather than seeing a recession happen in terms of layoffs and sending people home. We simply see that job openings shut down.

This has potentially interesting consequences. If what we are seeing is that for some reason – maybe hardship, maybe life cycle – folks are passing through this sector, then when this sector shuts down on hiring its going to have some strange outside-insider implications.
We are not going to see lots of workers loosing their jobs, simply that the opportunity for new workers to gain jobs will collapse. This is somewhat different from how we commonly talk about job markets.
And, in general I think its important to point out that much of the US workforce is in areas that don’t have the office like dynamics that are common to folks who read and right blogs.
For example another sector where layoffs were not the norm but hiring collapsed was health care and education. That’s even larger in terms of employment.

10 comments
Comments feed for this article
Sunday ~ April 15th, 2012 at 10:39 am
dpearson@aol.com
Leisure and hospitality hiring is partly a function of net new firm creation. Net new firm creation is a function of start-up capital availability. Key technologies (e.g. home equity extraction) for supplying start-up capital were found to be non viable during the GFC. Is this a supply problem, or a demand problem? How does one measure an “output gap” when the dynamics of financial technology and new firm employment are so murky?
Sunday ~ April 15th, 2012 at 11:54 am
rjsigmund
maybe you’d be interested in the BLS employment projections for the next decade:
http://bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.nr0.htm
see table 6: The 30 occupations with the largest projected job growth
http://bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.t06.htm
Monday ~ April 16th, 2012 at 11:53 am
David Manheim
These categories are generally useless – the more education needed, the more specialized, the fewer people per category. So of course low education workers are projected as higher growing.
Sunday ~ April 15th, 2012 at 12:18 pm
Becky Hargrove
A lot of people who once had office jobs were able to go back to retail (sometimes retail was the first job out of college), and then when that finally dried up, went back to the restaurant work that once helped to pay college tuitions decades earlier. Then the restaurant jobs got tighter: you accurately described what happened to a fair number of baby boomers (such as myself) even though they are a smaller part of unemployment statistics.
Then the middle class story comes next: Healthcare workers are warned not to leave the good jobs they have, because they would have a hard time finding another. They must hate every commercial they see on TV encouraging all the unemployed or underemployed to further their education in healthcare.
Sunday ~ April 15th, 2012 at 1:31 pm
Lord
Can these be turned into median job and unemployment durations for various industries (though hard to categorize unemployment in an industry unless they were previously or post in it)?
Sunday ~ April 15th, 2012 at 8:27 pm
Benny Lava
This is really fascinating. I wonder if some labor inflexability in hospitality is due to the huge fixed capital costs. If you own a 12 story hotel can you really just shut down the top 6 floors and lay off half your staff? I don’t know but I’d like to find out.
Monday ~ April 16th, 2012 at 4:31 am
Ken
My theory, I9 forms from ICE. Documented workers simply rep
lacing undocumented workers, to some extent.
Monday ~ April 16th, 2012 at 8:12 am
The Impending Tax Debate – Tyler’s AM Reads – April 16, 2012 « Blog of Rivals
[...] Karl Smith explores employment in the hospitality and leisure sector. [...]
Monday ~ April 16th, 2012 at 12:39 pm
What´s stopping the economy from churning? | Historinhas
[...] after I read this interesting post by Karl Smith – “How the economy churns” – who plays around with the JOLTS data to show [...]
Tuesday ~ April 17th, 2012 at 4:27 am
lorenzofromoz
who read and right blogs. Paging Dr Freud …