Over at The Atlantic, where we will be guest blogging for Megan, I have a piece about the progress of technology and why we should all be futurists now. One sign of progress is improvement of autonomous vehicles, and the DARPA Grand Challenge, which paid million dollar cash rewards, played a big part in helping that along. Now DARPA has a new challenge for humanoid robotics. Here is a summary of the challenge:
The goal of this Grand Challenge is to create a humanoid robot that can operate in an environment built for people and use tools made for people. The specific challenge is built around an industrial disaster response.
There are also details on what the humanoid robot will be required to do:
1) The robot will maneuver to a open frame utility vehicle, such as a John Deere Gator or a Polaris Ranger. The robot is to get into the driver’s seat and drive it to a specified location.
2) The robot is to get out of the vehicle, maneuver to a locked door, unlock it with a key, open the door, and go inside.
3) The robot will traverse a 100 meter, rubble strewn hallway.
4) At the end of the hallway, the robot will climb an ladder.
5) The robot will locate a pipe that is leaking a yellow-colored gas (non-toxic, non-corrosive). The robot will then identify a valve that will seal the pipe and actuate that valve, sealing the pipe.
6) The robot will locate a broken pump and replace it.
Hopefully this will spur progress on humanoid robotics like the other Grand Challenges have spurred progress in autonomous vehicles.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Thursday ~ April 5th, 2012 at 3:25 am
FT Alphaville » Further reading
[...] – And why we should all be futurists now. [...]
Thursday ~ April 5th, 2012 at 7:55 am
Why continental policy doesn’t work. Again. « The Daily News Brief
[...] from the future: humanoid robots. (If I value one skill in robots, it’s climbing [...]
Thursday ~ April 5th, 2012 at 11:43 am
Sir Algernon
This is stunning! I am carefully excited by the potential offered by advanced robotics, even though I’ll be the first to admit that I understand only about 1% of the challenges and technical complexity of the field.
It has the potential, in my mind at least, to free up so much capacity for more humans to focus on creating, thinking, inventing. The agglomeration and network effects could be fantastic.
We can also draw more and more people into the creative class and away from dangerous or mechanical work (not that there is anything wrong with those, it’s just better for people, IMO, to do more interesting things in the long term).
Sunday ~ April 8th, 2012 at 7:19 pm
Por qué Google nos quiere ciborgs y por qué queremos serlo… pero no con él
[...] el punto en el que estamos no se trata ya de sustituir choferes por robots, aunque hay quien está apostando cuantiosas inversiones a este «toque humano». Y Google lo entendió muy bien cuando lanzó el siguiente vídeo de su primer automóvil [...]
Sunday ~ April 8th, 2012 at 7:22 pm
Por qué Google nos quiere ciborgs y por qué queremos serlo… pero por nuestros propios medios
[...] el punto en el que estamos no se trata ya de sustituir choferes por robots, aunque hay quien está apostando cuantiosas inversiones a este «toque humano». Y Google lo entendió muy bien cuando lanzó el siguiente vídeo de su primer automóvil [...]
Wednesday ~ April 11th, 2012 at 11:19 am
Vínculos marginales XXXV « Notas marginales
[...] desastres naturales. Ahora DARPA (sí, ellos de nuevo), impulsará y financiará el desarrollo de robots humanoides que utilicen herramientas humanas y operen durante catástrofes. (Modeled [...]