Housing markets need better information. An interesting AP article discusses both the informational problems in determining how big the shadow inventory of housing is, and how informational problems are in part causing the housing inventory:
Economists at CoreLogic, a California company that analyzes mortgage data, weigh in at the low end, charting 1.6 million homes in shadow inventory nationwide. They count homes not listed for sale, with loans that are at least 90 days overdue, in foreclosure or bank-owned.
Others say the shadow is much bigger. Laurie Goodman of Amherst Securities in New York says it covers from 8.3 million to 10.4 million homes. Goodman’s analysis includes homes with loans that are at least 60 days overdue, have been delinquent in the past and are likely to go into default again, and thousands of homes whose owners are making payments but are likely to give up because they are so far “underwater,” in homes worth less than they owe.
“The question is `how long is the shadow?’” Goodman says. “I think some people are definitely underestimating the seriousness of the problem.”
And more on the difficulty in reading price signals in this environment:
But investors and those who represent them complain banks are not realistic about the prices they’ll accept. Verna, the real estate agent specializing in distressed properties, says that slowing the flow of homes into the market creates an artificially low inventory in some neighborhoods, which can temporarily lift prices. At the same time, lenders are increasingly selling homes or the underlying loans in bulk to hedge funds.
That’s where Verna comes in, tracking down borrowers to convince them to trade deeds for cash, and turning around homes like the building on 21st Street for resale. This takes patience and a strong stomach. Abandoned homes are frequently trashed or occupied by squatters. Borrowers are difficult to track down and reluctant to talk.
Verna has tracked one homeowner from address to address to address. Each time the real estate agent thinks he’s caught up, the man has moved again.
At this rate, Verna figures it will be three to five years before lenders let all the homes go. The risk is that, by moving too slowly they could artificially raise prices in some areas, which might spur investors who bought homes as rentals to put them up for sale.
H/T Market Urbanism

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Sunday ~ April 1st, 2012 at 2:09 pm
anoncubed
CoreLogic is the private data supplier to the Federal Reserve.
Do you really think that they will be the bearer of bad news to The Bernank? I don’t. The Bernank gave them the gig. The Fed used to use the OFHEO before they became the FHFA. CoreLogic might lose the Fed gig plus their vig as a mortgage servicer if they put the TRUTH out in the public space. Don’t worry, they have briefed The Bernank on how bad it really is out there.
Nobody knows how many residential units are in the lower 48. And nobody knows how many of those units are financed (within a couple of million units).
But everyone knows to the penny the value of the S&P500 second by second.
Owners`equity in real estate will not be materially different than this “A HREF=http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/fredgraph.png?&id=OEHRENWBSHNO&scale=Left&range=Max&cosd=1949-10-01&coed=2011-10-01&line_color=%230000ff&link_values=false&line_style=Solid&mark_type=NONE&mw=4&lw=1&ost=-99999&oet=99999&mma=0&fml=a&fq=Quarterly%2C+End+of+Period&fam=avg&fgst=lin&transformation=lin&vintage_date=2012-04-01&revision_date=2012-04-01″>FRED chart this year or in 2013.
I concur. Housing markets are lacking in info.
Monday ~ April 2nd, 2012 at 9:53 pm
Benny Lava
The funny thing is that real estate is public information. So every one of these shadow inventory properties is searchable in the county records. But no one has taken the time to do this, not even the Case-Schiller people.
I know the inventory is huge because I used to browse the REO property websites in 2008. Some big vendors had 20 pages of Detroit listing alone. By 2010 the Detroit listings were wittled down to just a few pages. The sames was true all over the country.
These banks were not prepared to be homeowners, and many of these properties suffered serious damages as a result. I am very curious to see how this all plays out.
Wednesday ~ April 4th, 2012 at 10:47 pm
Morgan Warstler
For all the hand wringing about the underwater folks it gets the moral language completely wrong.
People underwater have ZERO equity. They lose nothing when they lose their house except a credit ding, which is already dinged.
I have argued elsewhere that the left should have used the MERS violations to get the credit cleaned of people who left immediately. Leave, and make the credit rankers prove you had a proveable legal loan.
The travesty is that they didn’t jingle mails the keys earlier.
The reality is that the value of their home is not going up anytime soon, so they are paying too much of their monthly income in “rent”
If they left, and just flooded the market with homes, they could rent cheap and start capital formation again.
Sunday ~ April 8th, 2012 at 5:30 am
sally d
Housing still overpriced… That enough information?