This seems to be the theme building in Federal Reserve speeches and communication. Ben Bernanke today.
To sum up: A wide range of indicators suggests that the job market has been improving, which is a welcome development indeed. Still, conditions remain far from normal, as shown, for example, by the high level of long-term unemployment and the fact that jobs and hours worked remain well below pre-crisis peaks, even without adjusting for growth in the labor force. Moreover, we cannot yet be sure that the recent pace of improvement in the labor market will be sustained. Notably, an examination of recent deviations from Okun’s law suggests that the recent decline in the unemployment rate may reflect, at least in part, a reversal of the unusually large layoffs that occurred during late 2008 and over 2009. To the extent that this reversal has been completed, further significant improvements in the unemployment rate will likely require a more-rapid expansion of production and demand from consumers and businesses, a process that can be supported by continued accommodative policies.
Rate are improving, but “conditions remain far from normal” in the level.
This links well with “economic conditions are likely to warrant an exceptionally low level for the Federal Funds rate”
We are beginning to see a strong implicit recognition that the relevant economic conditions are not the growth rates of real variables but the level of those variables, particularly employment.
Fed officials appear unwilling at this point to make similar statements about the price level, though we have seem some significant table-setting by Charles Evans in that regard.
Though I would generally regard this as a slow and steady move to shift expectations, it could also be regarded as “Odyssean” guidance, in that as the Fed takes more and more implicit responsibility for the level of employment it is providing ammunition to its dovish critics.
This in turn changes the Fed’s loss function so that an attempt to raise rates early is more difficult.
I should note the dynamics of a body that has some but limited tools to alter its own loss function are fascinating in-and-of-themselves.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Monday ~ March 26th, 2012 at 9:11 am
Edwin Perello
I still say Bernanke is sitting twiddling his thumbs waiting for the fiscal gears to turn and churn (e.g. Summers-DeLong). He’s already indicated that he’s looking to the government’s move; he’s been indicating that he believes exactly what Summers and DeLong are now officially advocating.
Monday ~ March 26th, 2012 at 4:11 pm
Will policy finally be concerned with Levels? | Historinhas
[...] is how Karl Smith interpreted it: Rates are improving, but “conditions remain far from normal” in the [...]
Tuesday ~ March 27th, 2012 at 3:54 am
Setting the Table for Implicit Level Targeting Read… « zumoit
[...] the Table for Implicit Level Targeting Read more: http://modeledbehavior.com/2012/03/26/setting-the-table-for-implicit-level-targeting/ Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]
Tuesday ~ March 27th, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Bernanke Puzzled Over Jobs, Cites Okun's Law; Six Things Bernanke is Clueless About - London Ontario Alternative News for Local Business, World News, Sports & Entertainment Plus FREE CLASSIFIEDS
[...] Setting the Table for Implicit Level Targeting (modeledbehavior.com) [...]
Tuesday ~ March 27th, 2012 at 8:31 pm
George
Isn’t unemployment almost always thought about as a level, while GDP is thought of in terms of growth rates? If the Fed said “GDP is still at an unacceptably low level” I would be much more inclined to view that as a significant shift.