In a long column that basically cuts against my view of the world Steve Pearlstein mentions
The global financial system teeters on the edge of collapse because European politicians refused to tell citizens of their crumbling economies that they could no longer guarantee them “la dolce vita” – the sweet life – they had come to expect.
Taken at face value this statement is somewhat true. However, Pearlstein backs it up with the more traditional notion that:
. . . that’s how it seemed at the time to the political leaders of Greece and Italy, who couldn’t imagine a world where public employees couldn’t retire at 55.
But, of course public employees retireeing at 55 can’t itself be the source of global financial collapse or indeed any type of macro-economic instability.
Instead, the source of our problems is the inability of the Italian and Greek currency to fall in value.
And, that should make perfect sense if you think about the story you are telling here. If you people are trying to buy more of “la dolce vita” than they are willing to produce then what should happen to “la dolce vita”?
Its price should rise.
That is to say scooters, cappuccinos, leather shoes, gelato – the material elements of “la dolce vita” – should all become more expensive. When that happens people will buy less.
As it happens the market will work towards equilibrium both ways. The demand for Greek and Italian labor will rise as well. Retiring at 55 will seem like a less good idea both because it buys less “la vita dolce” and because the opportunities to continue working will expand.
However, this cannot happen. And, it cannot happen because the European Central Bank refuses to let prices rise. It refuses to say that a Euro today just can’t go as far as a Euro yesterday because there is just not enough Europe to go around.
Without this adjustment real wages can’t fall, the price of “la Vita Dolce” can’t rise and demand for Greek and Italian labor cannot increase.
I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession is not when something bad happens. A recession is not when people are poor.
A recession is when markets fail to clear. We have workers without factories and factories without workers. We have cars without drivers and drivers without cars. We homes without families and families without their own home.
Prices clear markets. If there is a recession, something is wrong with prices.

10 comments
Comments feed for this article
Sunday ~ November 13th, 2011 at 3:58 pm
Nick Rowe
Yep. A recession is a type of coordination failure where it becomes easier to buy things with money and harder to sell things for money so you can buy things with that money.
Sunday ~ November 13th, 2011 at 7:00 pm
"I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession is not when something bad happens. … A recession is when markets fail to clear." « Economics Info
[...] Source [...]
Sunday ~ November 13th, 2011 at 7:41 pm
This is what progress looks like « Shewing the fly
[...] bank NGDP-targeting, if it works, is a solution to a specific problem, which Karl Smith today described better than I ever could I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession is not when something bad happens. A recession is [...]
Monday ~ November 14th, 2011 at 3:31 pm
All linky, no thinky « Blunt Object
[...] Prices clear markets, ctd (Modeled Behavior) [...]
Friday ~ April 27th, 2012 at 7:48 am
Britain is not your standard AD story – a follow up « Shewing the fly
[...] convinced that this is the whole story, at least for the UK. Back in November, Karl Smith made the clearest statement I have ever read of the New Keynesian explanation of a recession: I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession is [...]
Friday ~ April 27th, 2012 at 11:54 am
Nam Le
According to this interpretation, the objective to maximise profit could be one factor causing recession then. So an essential element of capitalism could both create wealth and recession for people – even simultaneously, depending on one side you are, I guess.
Friday ~ April 27th, 2012 at 12:20 pm
What Is Happening to the UK « Modeled Behavior
[...] Williamson wants an answer Back in November, Karl Smith made the clearest statement I have ever read of the New Keynesian explanation of a [...]
Saturday ~ April 28th, 2012 at 5:33 am
interfluidity » Great Britain as a case study: which sticky price?
[...] demand deficiency] is the whole story, at least for the UK. Back in November, Karl Smith made the clearest statement I have ever read of the New Keynesian explanation of a [...]
Tuesday ~ May 8th, 2012 at 5:03 pm
Great Britain as a case study: which sticky price? | The Big Picture
[...] demand deficiency] is the whole story, at least for the UK. Back in November, Karl Smith made the clearest statement I have ever read of the New Keynesian explanation of a recession: I can’t hammer this home enough. A recession [...]
Tuesday ~ May 21st, 2013 at 11:41 am
Brian Dell’s journal
[…] Karl Smith (via pegobry) […]