You are a centrist New Keynesian Technocrat who is set to become Treasury Secretary during what looks like a replay of the Great Depression and the Japanese Depression.
However, Ben Bernanke is the Chairmen of your Central Bank. You are used to an environment where the Chairman exercises his full moral authority and moves the entire Federal Reserve. Ben Bernanke is personally an expert on the Great Depression and was highly critical of the Bank of Japan’s failure to act during its crisis.
You also see your Chairman swiftly moving to create innovative facilities to prevent contagion from spreading in financial markets.
What are you likely to conclude?
- Your primary role is to enable the Fed. You have to create an environment where the Fed can enact the type of policy your Chairman advised Japan to enact two decades ago. This means in large part bringing down risk spreads in the financial markets. You don’t believe you can do this if banks are afraid of overly aggressive action by the Central Government. Your role is then to stonewall such action.
- You are aware that the Fed may need to engage in Quantitative Easing. The Fed will likely receive criticism that it is “Monetizing the Debt” and that the US is becoming a Banana Republic. You need to remove such criticism by staking out a serious position on the US’s long term fiscal situation.
- You believe that populist anger is likely to rise up from the Left. This is your sense of the history of these types of situations. The danger of this could take many forms but the most obvious is the empowerment of activists and Congressmen who want to rapidly increase regulation. You need to stand in the way of this.
In short, your mission seems simple. Hold together the centrist neoliberal vision of the relationship between the State and the Economy while the Federal Reserve hits the gas and revives the economy.
You know its only a matter of time before Bernanke makes a credible commitment to be irresponsible, the dollar falls, US manufacturing revives and middle America experiences a mini-boom.
You just have to hold back the lions until that time arrives.
Unfortunately it never arrives and you are left having cut the legs out from underneath fiscal policy that could have revived the economy. You put deficit reduction on the table at exactly the wrong time and you hobbled the only effective counterweight to a massive populist uprising on the Right.
Hindsight is 20/20.

15 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 3:41 pm
Curt Doolittle
Exactly.
Although, the right would have never been able to rally without the healthcare program that was enacted over the will of the people, leading to the right taking control of congress.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 4:07 pm
Th
If Geithner thought the conservative Republican Bernanke was going to withstand the heat from the right and bail out Obama’s Presidency, he is way too dumb to have his job.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 8:35 pm
rootless_e
Oh for fuck’s sake. Which Congress do you think was going take part in this “The danger of this could take many forms but the most obvious is the empowerment of activists and Congressmen who want to rapidly increase regulation. You need to stand in the way of this.”
Geithner standing in the way of the 2008 US Congress rapidly increasing regulation is counter-factual fantasy. This is why it is impossible to take the “progressives” seriously. Dodd-Frank passed with what margin?
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 9:09 pm
DTAF (@D_T_A_F)
I’m with Curt. Let me tell a slightly different story: You know that a ton of stimulus is required after Fall 2008, because you a New Keynesian Technocrat. Unfortunately, your boss campaigned on reforming healthcare, and REALLY wants to do so. Your boss rejects the idea that just because the last Potus was an irresponsible twit who failed to save seed during the years of feast, the new Potus shouldn’t be albe to enact his own legislative priorities. So, your boss decides to spend the first 18 months of his Presidency and most of his political capital on healthcare reform. You convince him to do some stimulus, but a huge percentage of it is tax cuts, and you know it’s way too small, because you’ve been reading Paul Krugman. And it is too small. Because you know Ben Bernanke’s history, you know his commitment to preventing deflation — deflation, that’s the key word. So you do count on him to keep us from total Armaggedon, and you hope for the best. You are worried about populism from the Left, and getting the banking system on its feet, so you don’t do anything smart like reinstating Glass-Steagall, at least not yet, not before health. Meanwhile, healthcare reform focuses the country on the debt situation, because of its discussion of long-term costs, and crystalizes the Tea Party Movement. You find yourself surprised the Fed’s relative timidity. The Tea Party movement undercuts any ability to do more stimulus when you’re finished with that healthcare stuff, though you’re able to help negotiate continuation of some tax cuts, so that’s good. By this time, your boss decides to kill terrorists and otherwise do pretty much nothing else except try to get reelected.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 9:18 pm
chico
hmmmm…at what point in late 2010 and early 2011 was it not clear to everyone that bernanke was not going to hit the gas?
regardless, everyone’s got an excuse for a strategy that hasnt worked. well…guess what, in the real world, when something fails miserably,it doesnt really matter why. call it incompetence, ignorance or naivete or just being outmaneuvered. the bottom line is that you failed in a situation where failure was not an option. and then you move off to the side and someone who isnt incompetent, ignorant, naive or outmaneuvered takes over and tries to fix what you f’d up.
and…this is why neoliberals need to go the way of the brontasaurus.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 9:19 pm
rootless_e
I love this fantasy that the US congress in 2009 was champing at the bit to restore Glass-Steagal – a law, by the way, that would not have applied to AIG, Lehman, BearStearns, Goldman-Sachs, Deutsche Bank or any of the other stars of the financial crisis and would not have limited Countrywide in any way etc. It’s terrible how Obama, under Geithner’s orders, vetoed all that progressive banking legislation Congress passed – oh wait that’s not what happened. What actually happened is that the weak Dodd-Frank bill was pushed through Congress with enormous effort and no margin by Geithner and Obama.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 9:59 pm
DTAF (@D_T_A_F)
Good point on Glass-Steagall. I still think they blew their wad on healthcare reform, and that that is the driving story of Obama’s Presidency.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 10:01 pm
rootless_e
health reform is more important than financial reform
Saturday ~ November 12th, 2011 at 12:56 pm
Phil Perspective
Yeah, Dodd-Frank which won’t even prevent the next crisis which is being caused by Geithner’s European buddies. Spare me your nonsense. The President is far from “The Greatest Evah!!” Why? Tell all the unemployed, and underemployed wondering if they’ll still have a job in 6 months, or get a raise anytime soon. And you really have no leg to stand on because it was the President and his advisers who coddled HolyJoe and Ben Nelson(remember that approximate $600,000 ad buy by the DNC for Nelson after the Cornhusker Kickback fiasco?)
Saturday ~ November 12th, 2011 at 12:39 am
Jimbo
Agreed. We live in a much more primitive age in which only simple-mnded measures can be passed by Congress. 2/3rds of the Congress are composted of milliionaires. Not going to see much reform from them.
Friday ~ November 11th, 2011 at 9:41 pm
Leigh Caldwell (@leighblue)
If Geithner thought all that, wouldn’t he have given Bernanke a call just to double check? What do you think Bernanke said?
Saturday ~ November 12th, 2011 at 7:06 am
Happy Hour Roundup – World Wide Magazine, your internet eyes …
[...] 10. Karl Smith makes the case for Geithner. [...]
Saturday ~ November 12th, 2011 at 9:29 am
R.M. Flanagan
Because of HCR some people will avoid avoidable suffering.
That’s an historic achievement. If it hadn’t occured the Republicans would have behaved exactly the same.
The very weaknesses of Obamacare are the proof that there would have been no better opportunity to remedy this disgrace.
Obama had greatness thrust upon him .
Saturday ~ November 12th, 2011 at 9:31 am
rootless_e
A longer response
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2011/11/why-cant-we-have-smart-left-or-even.html
Thursday ~ May 2nd, 2013 at 7:16 am
Cheap Glow In The Dark Air Jordan 11 Retro Concord Version shoes
Well I really liked studying it. This post procured by you is very effective.