I am somewhat disappointed both by the mildness of the statement and the once again triple dissent. Kocherlakota signaled that this was going to end. It doesn’t look good for Fed creditability. It also signals that the Fed can be politicized. Neither are good.
I am also not sure what to make of adding that line
–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run –
to the Funds policy statement. My gut tells me that it was intended as a harmless clarification by a Chairman obsessed with transparency.
However, as a traditional Fed watcher I would read that statement as tightening Fed policy, as it makes the promise seem more conditional.

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
Thursday ~ September 22nd, 2011 at 4:32 am
Jonathan Bernstein: Happy Hour Roundup « domainedesjeux
[...] For analysis of the Fed statement, start with Ezra Klein for an overview and then see Brad DeLong, Mark Thoma, and Karl Smith. [...]
Thursday ~ September 22nd, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Wonks Anonymous
Taking over AmConMag has turned Ron Unz into the anti Karl Smith. He advocates raising the minimum wage and cracking down on underpayment precisely to get rid of immigrant jobs so they go home. And thinks this would improve Wal-Mart’s bottom line since it worked for Henry Ford.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/
I didn’t hear about his 90s gubernatorial candidacy until a decade later, but this sounds like pretty much the opposite of his platform from back then.