Jeff Sach’s a column on the nature of our jobs problem. His key point I think is this
Our growth and employment problems are structural, and need a structural response. . . .
The structural problem is that America has lost its international competitiveness in basic industries including textiles, apparel, and several other areas of manufacturing. The production jobs are now in China, India, and elsewhere, where wages are much lower while productivity is more or less comparable to the US (and where production often involves US companies, using US technologies, producing overseas and re-exporting to the US market). Only US college grads can resist the international competitive pressures; high-school grads have found the labor market fall out from beneath their feet
I don’t think Sach’s diagnosis is quite right but he is identifying the symptoms of a larger syndrome. I like to break the economy into Goods and Government vs. the Private Service Sector.
Goods and Government make up a lot of what we used to think of as the middle class: Textile Workers, Riveters, Machinists, Carpenters, Teachers, Fire Fighters, Police Officers, etc. Not wait staff but not doctors and lawyers either. The middle middle.
I want to contrast the employment in these two super-sectors because its so striking. Here is employment data going back to the end of WWII

Up until about 1975 or so the two super-sectors were growing at roughly the same rate and each commanded about half of the workforce. Then the two started to break apart and private services marched higher and higher while goods and government experienced over going on 40 years of stagnation. Unless something major changes there will have been almost as many workers in goods and government in 1975 as in 2015.
Indeed, if as I suspect, manufacturing and teacher employment continue to trend downward there may be fewer in 2015 than in 1975.
This is not just a story about manufacturing either the ratio of government workers to private service workers had a strong peak in the 70s

While the ratio of goods producing workers to private service has been declining pretty steadily since the 1950s

Preliminarily I might say that up until 1975 the US was running a de facto Nordic Model, where declines in middle class manufacturing jobs were made up for by increases in middle class government jobs.
That stopped around 1975 and since then there has big a large divergence.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 1:38 pm
Jason Bradfield
The first graph bears a striking resemblance to productivity trends and average hourly compensation:
http://tinyurl.com/4x3tp6g
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 4:19 pm
Curt Doolittle
So, maybe I’m missing something, but how does that refute Jeff’s assertion? Isnt’ he right that international competitiveness has declined despite the expansion of the private sector? And also because of the redirection of taxes from jobs to benefits (redistribution)?
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 10:28 pm
ezra abrams
1) your blog might be more populoar if you took a few seconds to make these fred graphs intelligble to the non cognoscenti – adding clear labels, not the cryptic ones from fred, and making sure the text is large enough to read; brad delong has the same problem, but not quite as bad.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 10:32 pm
ezra abrams
1) your blog might be more populoar if you took a few seconds to make these fred graphs intelligble to the non cognoscenti – adding clear labels, not the cryptic ones from fred, and making sure the text is large enough to read; brad delong has the same problem, but not quite as bad.
2) if wages in china rise to roughly our level, and the chinese institute OSHA and EPA, etc, doesn’ that do a lot for our mfr jobs ?
3) I know that for the past 300 years or so, the industrial revolution has meant people loose their jobs to technology (can we start with luddites) but that over a generation or so, technology creates more jobs.
might that finally be ending ?
like all the people employed in customer service – you can see most of those jobs being displaced by software; in mfr, we finally see robotic factorys that can pump out goods without a lot of people; in the engineering design sector, we see programs like solidworks greatly reducing the need for engineers.
Saturday ~ September 17th, 2011 at 2:28 pm
skeptical worker
I’m with Ezra Abrams on the cryptic nature of the graphs but understand even less of the data as presented.
On point 3 of his comment, this seems to demonstrate that the division is between jobs that are either portable or that can be refined into an algorithm, allowing them to follow cheap labor here or abroad, and jobs that have to be done where the work is — food prep/service, construction, teaching, medical care, legal and other services. Electronics assembly, clothing, telephone support, are all examples of jobs that can be refined to routine or scriptable steps.
There was talk that the service sector was where the action was going to be but I don’t think anyone understood that to mean that would be all that was left.
Thursday ~ September 29th, 2011 at 7:09 pm
The Future of Jobs « azmytheconomics
[...] David Autor on job polarization. Robots steal your job. Firms are investing in tech, not workers. Changes in composition of jobs. LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]