By: Lars Christensen
The Market Monetarist school has emerged in the blogosphere as a clear competitor to mainstream Keynesians as well as to the Austrian school thinking. However, Market Monetarists have really not been very clear about their intellectual heritage.
In my recent paper on Market Monetarism I identify two overall Market Monetarist principles:
- Money matters.
- Markets matter.
These principles have some origin in economic literature. Here I present a short reading list that should get aspiring Market Monetarists up to date with the background on Market Monetarist thinking. The list is highly incomplete and I encourage others to pitch in with reading material, which is or should be important for the intellectual development of Market Monetarism.
Money Matters
Of course Milton Friedman is mandatory reading for anybody. Read everything Friedman wrote, but I think Money Mischief is an excellent introduction to a lot of Friedman’s thinking. Here you will learn why inflation is always and everywhere and monetary phenomenon, why it is highly unlikely that a fiat central bank would find itself in a liquidity trap liquidity trap, and of course why low interest rates is not the same as easy monetary policy.
It’s not possible to understand the concept of monetary disequilibrium and the monetary transmission mechanism without having read Leland Yeager and Clark Warburton. The Fluttering Veil is a collection of Yeager’s papers and Depression, Inflation and Monetary Policy is an excellent collection of Warburton’s research.
Concerning the monetary transmission mechanism you course have to read Brunner and Meltzer, but its complicated and not nearly as exciting as Warburton and Yeager.
Scott Sumner loves Mishkin’s textbook on monetary theory, but frankly I find it somewhat boring compared to reading Yeager and Warburton.
Markets Matter
Yes, we all know Sumner’s and Woolsey’s NGDP futures ideas so there is no reason to tell you too much about that (Ok you should read Scott’s The Case for NGDP Targeting). However, the use of market pricing as a tool for the conduct of monetary policy is not a new concept! It enjoys a rich intellectual history. Literature regarding Swedish monetary policy during the 1930′s – Cassel and Wicksell is a great place to start. Berg and Jonung’s 1998 paper Pioneering Price Level Targeting: the Swedish Experience 1931-37 is another excellent resource. For a more contemporary discussion of market-based approaches to monetary policy, check out Johnson’s and Keleher’s excellent book Monetary Policy, A Market Based Approach, from 1996.
An often-forgot kinship is the relationship between the Market Monetarists and the Free Banking Theorists. David Glasner’s and George Selgin’s books on Free Banking are mandatory reading. Both tell the story about how basically a perfect competition Free Banking world will end up has having a fully elastic money supply and as a consequence effectively have Nominal GDP targeting. This should in my view be the welfare theoretical foundation for the Market Monetarists’ focus on NGDP targeting. Another excellent “free banking” book regarding targeting the price level is Selgin’s nice little book Less than Zero (that will also remind you that Market Monetarists are not inflationists).
Reading on Current Events
The leading Market Monetarists have told a very valid and impressive story on why the Great Recession happened and how the Federal Reserve failed in doing something about it. However, in my view the story told by Scott Sumner and Robert Heztel among others is far from complete. Hence, in my view the explanation for the crisis is far too US-centric as it ignores the massive increase in European dollar demand in late 2008 and 2009 and later again in 2011. This explanation clearly has something in common with the increase in gold demand leading up to the Great Depression (Scott Sumner could tell you all about that!). Obviously Barry Eichengreen has a lot to say about that in Golden Fetters (who will write the book “Green Fetters” about excessive demand for dollars as a cause for the
Great Recession??). However, remember when you read Eichengreen that a central bank that is doing its job (ie calibrating its policy instruments such that it expects to hit its target), “fiscal stimulus” is redundant at best. Also, have a look at Douglas Irwin’s excellent working paper Did France cause the Great Depression? – just the title of the paper makes it worth having a look doesn’t it?
And then of course both Robert Hetzel and Scott Sumner have books in the pipeline – I am sure they will be worth reading. These guys are at the core of the Market Monetarist movement – so gentlemen please get your books out asap!

13 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Invisible Backhand
I have a problem with a school of thought subsidized by the rich whose philosophy just happens to be what the rich want to hear.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 4:03 pm
Wonks Anonymous
Who is subsidizing market monetarism?
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Lars Christensen
Nobody unfortunately…but I think the Backhand had a chat with god and he convinced him there is a conspiracy…
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 7:36 pm
Invisible Backhand
Not subsidizing monetarism, subsidizing the school-GMU, Univ Chicago, think tanks etc. The billionaires are paying big money for scholarly justifications for whatever they want.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 1:11 pm
To Bedlam at a gallop on the “credit horse” | Historinhas
[...] pretty much in line with the Market Monetarists views. It also indicates that the responsibility for depth and breadth of the “Great Recession” [...]
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
Rob
A note on the free bankers. Their model does not depend upon “perfect competition” as stated – just an unhampered free market in currency issue and banking and no central bank.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Lars Christensen
Rob, I am well aware of that. Selgin & Co. does not assume “perfect competition”. The reason I use the term is to make a parallel to welfare theoretical discussions where “perfection competition” is the benchmark for optimality. My argument is that Free Banking under perfect competition is “socially optimal” (if one likes that kind of argument…) and that any none-free banking monetary system should try to emulate that.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 4:05 pm
Rob
OK. Then (to be a little pedantic) in my view it is not correct to say that Free Banking would “effectively have Nominal GDP targeting” . Rather Free Banking would eliminate the need for NGDP targeting by instead allowing profit-maximizing banks to stabilize the money supply. I guess here you are probably just trying to say that they achieve the same things by different means
BTW: I found your paper on Market Monetarism an excellent foundation on the subject.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 5:32 pm
Lars Christensen
Rob, don’t worry I would much rather argue for Free Banking than for NGDP targeting. But I see NGDP targeting as Friedman saw school vouchers – an means to get to privatised education.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 5:42 pm
Lars Christensen
And thanks Rob…I hope the paper can help spread the word and educate people on the subject, but also stir some more hardcore research.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 2:52 pm
Desolation Jones
I can’t stress enough how good Yeager’s Fluttering Veil is. It’s highly readable even for those without much of an economics background.
There’s one obvious sharp contrast you will notice between Yeager and the modern quasi-monetarist. While quasi-monetarists don’t believe in the “long and variable lags” of monetary policy, Yeager does. Most of the essays were written in the 70s though so it’s possible he has changed is mind. Would love to know Yeager’s current thoughts.
Friday ~ September 16th, 2011 at 3:07 pm
Lars Christensen
DJ, you are very right. Everybody should read Yeager’s Fluttering Veil. It is a wonderful book. And I would also very much like to hear what Yeager think about these things…
Come to think of it I should have mentioned Alan Rabin’s book “Monetary Theory”. It is for natural reasons very a very Yeagerian book.
Wednesday ~ September 21st, 2011 at 11:52 am
Shane Chubbs
Has anyone looked at if it would be better to level target George Reisman’s Gross Domestic Revenue (GDR) instead of NGDP? That may help prevent bubbles in the parts of B that are not parts of I?