Kevin Drum has some interesting thoughts on oil. The thesis
The basic story is simple: As long as there’s spare oil-production capacity, increasing demand caused by economic growth produces only a steady, manageable increase in oil prices. But oil production is now close to its maximum and can’t be easily or quickly expanded. When the global economy grows enough that demand starts to bump up against this ceiling, oil prices don’t rise slowly and steadily; rather, they spike suddenly, causing a recession, which in turn reduces oil demand and drives down prices. When the economy recovers, the cycle starts all over. Because of this dynamic, the production ceiling for oil produces a corresponding ceiling for world economic growth.
Oil and the macro-economy is definitely on my to-do list. I have strong priors that money, credit and banking are where its at, but the evidence on oil is intriguing.
My neophyte impression, however, is that $135 a barrel oil doesn’t make sense. As I understand it, the tar sands, shale oil and other non-conventional sources can be profitably tapped at constant price of $80 a barrel.
This implies that an oil prices that stays where it is today will see an enormous expansion in those resources. And, so it seems that is beginning to happen. Via Bloomberg:
North America will become the fastest growing oil-producing region outside OPEC during the next five years, with output estimated to jump 11 percent, according to the International Energy Agency.
The region is likely to see output climb 1.5 million barrels a day to 15.6 million by 2016 mostly because of increased output from Canadian oil sands and U.S. onshore shale formations, the Paris-based adviser to oil-consuming nations said today in its Medium-Term Oil and Gas Markets report.
Now that’s still well short of the additional we’d need if we stretch Kevin’s counter-factual out to 2016. However, I am told by industry folks that the IEA is well behind the curve and that sustained prices could just in a much bigger jump in production.
Moreover, that’s just North American production. Non-conventional production in South America and Russia are said to have enormous potential as well.
When you combine those factors together I see how we might get short-run spikes but consistent upward pressure from emerging economies should open up new supplies and keep oil prices in the sub $100 range.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ August 26th, 2011 at 10:56 pm
Jim
The demand side is also less rigid than people imagine.
If we were serious about oil consumption, we would re-invent zoning laws that preclude many folks from walking to work, the corner grocer and the neighborhood pub.
IBM sent asked half their workforce to work from home back in the 90s during their restructuring to survive bankruptcy. Only convention prevents many organizations from doing the same now, especially given the plummeting cost of video.
On the supply energy side, there is much reason to be skeptical of the idea of peak oil. You mentioned some of them.
But we can be reasonably assured of one thing; emergence or innovation tends to arise from resurrecting and tinkering with old established ideas that already work. IOW, the constant drumb beat of inventing solar or wind is unlikely, especially given their extremely low BTU efficiencies.
Friday ~ August 26th, 2011 at 11:05 pm
Colin
Have you seen the following post on fossil fuels and the Industrial Revolution? I think Tyler posted it on MR:
http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6781
Dn exactly what you meant by “neophyte” but it filled in some gaps for me on oil and the economy.
Saturday ~ August 27th, 2011 at 6:37 am
rjs
tar sands merely replaces declining mexican & alaskan production…north sea is almost tapped out too…texas fields went into permanent declines in the 70s
Saturday ~ August 27th, 2011 at 12:42 pm
Lord
I think Hamilton’s data shows spikes commonly reach 4x pre-spike prices so if $80 is the norm, spikes will probably reach $360.
Saturday ~ August 27th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Benny Lava
The flaw in your thinking is here: “As I understand it, the tar sands, shale oil and other non-conventional sources can be profitably tapped at constant price of $80 a barrel”
But how much will it sell for? Depends on what the market will bear. Will Chinese nouveau rich spend 135 dollars a barrel? If you think so – as I do – then oil will sell at 135 a barrel. The key thing is global supply and demand.
Sunday ~ August 28th, 2011 at 7:44 am
Sunday links: psychological weaknesses | Abnormal Returns
[...] Check out the surge in oil rigs drilling for oil in the US. (Real Time Economics, Modeled Behavior) [...]
Sunday ~ August 28th, 2011 at 1:17 pm
Sunday Link-Fest | ValueWalk.com
[...] Check out the surge in oil rigs drilling for oil in the US. (Real Time Economics,Modeled Behavior) [...]
Monday ~ August 29th, 2011 at 5:04 pm
That’s oil she wrote [The Economist] | DreamInn
[...] be a priority, quite apart from all the other reasons to reduce fossil fuel use. Now, Karl Smith argues that high prices are generating a supply response that will ultimately solve the oil shortage [...]