I’ll have more to say about this later. The debate is going to try to get at the Keynesian versus Austrian business cycle theories. So, it something of replay of the Keynes/Hayek rap battle.
For now I let the Mises.org description speak for me:
The great debate between Keynesians and Austrians enters the digital age with the Mises Academy’s first ever online formal debate, between economists Karl Smith and Robert P. Murphy.
RESOLVED: GOVERNMENT SPENDING CAN PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN BOOSTING ECONOMIC GROWTH
Smith will argue in favor of this resolution, and Murphy will argue against.
Karl Smith is Assistant Professor of Public Economics and Government at the School of Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Smith also contributes to the popular economic blog Modeled Behavior. (See Dr. Murphy’s bio below.)
Each speaker will have 12 minutes to present his case, followed by 8 minutes each for rebuttals. Then each speaker will have 1 minute to present a list of questions, which his opponent will have 4 minutes to answer. Finally each speaker will have 5 minutes for concluding remarks. The 60-minute debate will be followed by a 20 minute question-and-answer period, in which each speaker will have 10 minutes to respond to questions submitted by attendees. Attendees will also have the opportunity to vote for or against the resolution both before and after the debate. Will the debaters be able to sway opinions on either side? We shall see!
The debate will be held on Friday, September 2, at 6pm Eastern time. It will be online, and use Webex, the industry-standard web conferencing service. Exact instructions for attending the session will be available at the debate’s main page, which will be accessible here upon registration. The session will be recorded and made available for attendees to download.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Thursday ~ August 25th, 2011 at 1:14 pm
Curt Doolittle
Krugman won’t take Murphy’s bait.
I’m glad you did.
Thursday ~ August 25th, 2011 at 1:30 pm
Cahal Moran (@CahalMoran)
I think Krugman sort of sees it the way I would if a 6 year old challenged me to a fight. I’m not saying that’s necessarily the case, but I just think that’s how he views it.
Btw, the title of the debate confuses me. Murphy isn’t an anarcho-capitalist, is he? Because govenrment spending quite clearly plays a role in boosting economic growth, at least at some level…
Thursday ~ August 25th, 2011 at 5:23 pm
Curt Doolittle
Yes, Murphy is a Misesian/Rothbardian.
I don’t follow him that closely, but basically involuntary transfers are a problem in ethics, and without some ethical basis for political action, there are no limits to abuse. So I don’t doubt that he’ll go there.
The general argument is that small states with less interference actually outperform those with more interference. And I suspect that’s going to be his position.
Thursday ~ August 25th, 2011 at 2:03 pm
Lord
I always think these would be more interesting if after the conclusion of the debate, the parties would take the opposite side to see how well they can argue their opponents case.
Thursday ~ August 25th, 2011 at 3:07 pm
Wonks Anonymous
I enjoy reading both of you (although I haven’t read Murphy as frequently as I used to). Both entertaining in your own way. Even if this isn’t what he was originally aiming for, I would expect this to result in higher quality since you’ve already engaged in some previous back-and-forth.
Cathal Moran, yes Murphy calls himself an anarcho-capitalist. And he was using ThePoint so that even if Krugman didn’t particularly want to debate him, it would result in lots of money going to charity and so Krugman would consider that a good tradeoff.
Friday ~ August 26th, 2011 at 6:44 pm
nemi
I´m looking forward to it.
Good Luck!