I confess, I did not see this one coming: the Center for Science in the Public Interest has asked the government to ban food coloring. They argue that the coloring worsens hyperactivity in some children. Marion Nestle recently provided a rundown of the science behind food coloring and hyperactivity, and I think you’ll agree with me that the evidence is less than overwhelming. She only discusses two studies in detail. The first had problems, and the second found that 1 out of 23 kids showed a reaction. She links to another, more recent study but doesn’t discuss it. You would think we would need clear and strong evidence of a serious affect before we talked about banning a product.
Nevertheless, whether or not food coloring causes hyperactivity in some children is absolutely besides the point. Surely a cup of black coffee would cause hyperactivity in children, and yet we haven’t banned it. The absolute most this implies is for a clear labeling of products that include food coloring. I say a “clear labeling”, because I was under the impression that product packages already had to list their ingredients, including food coloring. Am I mistaken?
Food paternalists may find this unimaginably barbaric, but some people like a little color on their cakes, and prefer their cheese curls orange. In fact, given the prevalence of orange cheese curls, colored cakes, and a million other uses for food coloring it would appear that lots of people really do like them. But the fact that people prefer them is exactly why food paternalists are targeting them, and the hyperactivity claim is really just an excuse. You can see this in the quote from Marion Nestle:
“These dyes have no purpose whatsoever other than to sell junk food,” Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University.
This issue isn’t really about hyperactivity, it’s about another cudgel with which to try and get people to eat healthier foods. This is an invasive, overreaching, and dishonest attempt at regulating food. I hope that the more extreme the proposals get the more people will hesitate to support the groups like CSPI when they call for bans on stuff they don’t like. Because today they may be coming for a product or ingredient you don’t value, but rest assured, tomorrow they’ll be after something you do.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Monday ~ April 4th, 2011 at 11:29 am
Wonks Anonymous
CPSI also badgered theaters and restaurants into using trans-fats rather than, say, coconut oil. Then they decided trans-fats were bad. I don’t know if I’d agree with those who say their agenda is vegetarianism rather than public health, but I definitely do not see them as a scientifically reliable organization.
Monday ~ April 4th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
Dave Thomas
No freedom of choice? Another ill thought regulation giving impetus to the creation of a black market in food coloring. If these people found the truth do they possess so little faith in the power of the truth they discovered that they think people will ignore their truth? I will look forward to any debates on CSPAN runs on this issue so I can identify future leaders of promise when they dismiss such heavy-handedness in legislation during open debate.
Tuesday ~ April 5th, 2011 at 8:02 am
Browsing Catharsis – 04.05.11 « Increasing Marginal Utility
[...] Paternalists have gone from trans fats to Happy Meal toys to now food coloring. Richard Thaler now looks like quite the shithead for arrogantly scoffing at Whitman and Rizzo’s concern that legislating using behavioral economics will eventually lead to new excuses for special interest groups to force whatever they want on the American public. Yes, Thaler. Those Law & Economics guys know nothing about the perils of law and economics. Screw you. And my tone is much more civil than Thaler’s was in the above link, by the way. [...]
Tuesday ~ April 5th, 2011 at 2:00 pm
Zenobia
Yet another attempt to make the world bland and “khaki” and this time quite literally!
Wednesday ~ April 6th, 2011 at 2:57 pm
Marcia
Synthetic food dyes are made from petroleum and can trigger all sorts of health problems including the symptoms of ADHD. Whlle she only mentioned 2 studies. There are definitely others. You can see the research on the dyes themselves at http://www.feingold.org/Research/dye.html and the research on diet and various symptoms at http://www.feingold.org/research.php