Follow Modeled Behavior on Twitter
- @m_clem in which case again granting rights by IQ would be the lesser evil to greater evil in status quo. 1 hour ago
- @m_clem would be more apt comparison if status quo allowed few children born to begin with 1 hour ago
- RT @SimpsonsQOTD: "Let the bears pay the bear tax, I pay the Homer tax!" "That's the homeOWNER tax dad!" http://t.co/9dr60iPLbh 2 hours ago
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
Tags
Arnold Kling
bias
bubbles
China
demand
economic growth
economics
education
Fed
Federal
Federal Reserve
gdp
Growth
health
health care
house prices
housing
illegal immigration
immigration
Inflation
Kevin Drum
Krugman
labor economics
labor markets
markets
Matt Yglesias
minimum wage
Monetary
Monetary policy
Money
morality
NGDP
occupational licensing
paternalism
policy
real estate economics
Recession
regulation
Reserve
science
Taxes
Tyler Cowen
Unemployment
unions
Will Wilkinson

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Wednesday ~ November 3rd, 2010 at 6:10 pm
jazzbumpa
Really? In what way?
I see a multi-cultural, polyethnic nation divided along almost every imaginable fault line:
Wealth
Ethnicity
Age
Urbanity
Religion
Geography (coasts vs interior, N vs S)
Nascar vs NHL/NBA/NFL
Cheddar vs Brie
Should I include effete liberal snobbery?
How does any of this translate to one party rule?
My potential overlap with Kling probably hovers around the 1% mark, but I agree with his final sentence – I think:
For now, the only two elements of the political system are Progressive Corporatism and The Resistance. And the latter does not amount to much yet.
Though I’m not at all sure that we mean the same thing by “Progressive.”
I would use it as an adjective, and can make no sense of the oxymoron implied by his capitalization.
Meanwhile, Rand Paul and Ron Johnson are in the Senate.
WASF!
JzB
Thursday ~ November 4th, 2010 at 9:13 am
Edwin Perello
Yea. No.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/78892/the-house-republican-and-it-aint-going-back
“Why are Republicans in strong position to hold the House? Three reasons:”
1. Natural geography
Basically, most of the country is red because too many liberals are housing in already blue states, compounding their irrelevance as voters. Instead of turning red states blue, they’re holding their breath and turning more blue.
2. Redistricting
The GOP has won tons and tons of state legislatures and governorships. They’re going to be able to redistrict most states to their partisan ideal for an entire decade. Yay.
3. Timing
Unless Bernanke and the Fed grow a boner for Democratic wins in 2012 by making any QE work and lifting the economy up, Republicans will gain even more in 2012 due to lack of personal income growth and stagnant (and probably, by then, structural) unemployment. Even if Obama manages to retain his presidency, the GOP will win the Senate and perhaps even get a stronger hold in the House. If they win the presidency in 2012, the economy will have recovered by then (maybe) and they’ll get the applause, maintaining their leadership into 2014. They will probably lose a bit if the economy recovers by 2014 and Obama’s in office (voters will thank the president’s party). However, due to #1 and #2, any potential Democratic wins will be minimal at best. We’ll have a primarily Republican controlled Federal Government until 2020 when Kling’s prediction might come to fruition.
By then a lot of those minorities will be much more purple than blue, if not red.
Thursday ~ November 4th, 2010 at 11:44 am
Edwin Perello
Here’s Dick Morris pretty much saying the same thing: GOP will make it impossible for Dems to get House back until 2020, using redistricting.