So there has long been a casual argument that cancer is a disease of civilization. That is, that cancer was rare up until at least the development of large cities and perhaps industrialization. This might suggest pollution of some sort is a vital precursor to cancer.
Robin Hanson posts on some evidence to back up this claim
In modern populations, tumours arising in bone primarily affect the young, so a similar pattern would be expected in ancient populations. … Another explanation for the rarity of tumours in ancient remains is that tumours might not be well preserved; however, experimental studies show that mummification preserves the features of malignancy. ..
We propose that the minimal diagnostic evidence for cancer in ancient remains indicates the rarity of the disease in antiquity.
Though if this is the case then it seems we may be dealing with a ubiquitous set of pollutants as wild animal deaths from cancer seem to be on par with human rates.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Wednesday ~ October 20th, 2010 at 9:51 am
Overcoming Bias : Is Cancer Industrial?
[...] 20Oct: Karl points us to an article saying “Wild animals die of cancer at about the same rate [as humans [...]
Wednesday ~ October 20th, 2010 at 11:12 am
forwearemany
This is a good example of when poor science gets a lot of press, but the rebuttal doesn’t:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19591-briefing-cancer-is-not-a-disease-of-the-modern-world.html
http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2010/10/14/claims-that-cancer-is-only-a-%E2%80%98modern-man-made-disease%E2%80%99-are-false-and-misleading/
Wednesday ~ October 20th, 2010 at 1:11 pm
RickRussellTX
Another rebuttal:
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2010/10/20/is_cancer_a_disease_of_the_modern_world.php
Wednesday ~ October 20th, 2010 at 8:08 pm
drudgedawg
http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/05/the-risks-of-environmental-cancer
Thursday ~ October 21st, 2010 at 5:50 am
tomas
A disease of civilization? Definitely. A civilization that consumes so much carbs (compared to our evolutionary experience) that it virtually feeds and prolongs life of cancer cells and that would normally die.
The basic cancer presence test is in fact a glucose test – it highlights cancer cells devouring glucose. In a perfect world it would be obvious to cut off (especially those refined) carbohydrates and unstable (read “most of vegetable”) oils. But oops, the USDA got it wrong.
There are other precursors of course, but this one is of the most vital.
Thursday ~ October 21st, 2010 at 5:51 am
tomas
I meant
“cancer cells that would normally die”
I apologize