TV chef Anthony Bourdain has had some choice words, and also words of praise, for slow food maven Alice Waters, who I’ve also criticized, and praised, here and here. Here he is agreeing with the substance of my criticism of the slow food movement and it’s impracticality for low income people:
I am suspicious of wealthy suburbanites who preach “back to the soil” philosophies—as if most—or even many—could start digging subsistence gardens in their back yards or afford expensive organic or locavore lifestyles.
This summary of part of Bourdain and Water’s interaction at a recent food panel sums up their disagreements well:
According to Alice, we should “provide breakfast, lunch and a snack FOR FREE to every child in America,” even if it cost billions. “How could it not be worth it?” she defended, “these children are our future.” Then she mentioned a bumper sticker she saw that said, “If you are what you eat, I’m fast, cheap and easy” — and the shame in it. After that she went on and on till Bourdain said – “I put literacy above that as a priority” and everyone clapped.
It’s not just Anthony Bourdain that’s backing me up either; here’s is Alice Waters in an interview with Leslis Stahl on slow food as a luxury:
Waters told Stahl she rarely goes into a regular supermarket. “I’m looking for food that’s just been picked. And so, I know when I go the farmer’s market that you know, they just brought it in that day.”
“I have to say, it’s just a luxury to be able to do that,” Stahl remarked.
“In a sense it is a luxury,” Waters agreed.

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Saturday ~ October 9th, 2010 at 1:49 pm
RickRussellTX
And indeed, “local farmers’ markets” may be neither local nor farmers. Here in California, many families drive the roads of CA’s extensive agricultural regions, stopping off at farms and negotiating to buy fruits and vegetables that were on the vine a little too long, or are not fresh enough to sell to the major distributors.
These may indeed be very good vegetables, but the farms are the same ones supplying grocery stores. You’re not really getting a different product, you’re just paying for marginally higher quality product and the luxury of a market with a lot of variety.
Saturday ~ October 9th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
RasmusF
From a division of labor POV it seems crazy that people who work with something totally unrelated would be better off gardening for themselves than simply working more and then trading with somebody who specializes in producing vegetables.
My dad is both a former professional gardener and a former farmer. He has a pretty big vegetable garden he uses for household needs. It takes quite a bit of time and when I tease him that it would make better financial sense to just buy the veggies he pretty much agrees. He gardens because he enjoys the gardening, not because it’s a financially sensible.
My best guess is that some rural people actually benefit from gardening, some people enjoy it enough for it to be profitable, but most people who garden does so because they want others to think they’re commited to being enviromentally conscious and so on.
I think the emotional reactions you’ve gotten supports the idea that a lot of homegardeners are motivated by something more charged than trying to improve their nutrition or saving money.
Pretty similiar reasoning applies to homecooking, btw.
Sunday ~ October 10th, 2010 at 10:53 am
geerussell
The great distortion comes from locavore/organic/slowfood advocates framing the discussion as a “my way or the drive-thru” choice where the gulf is huge but the dichotomy is false.
The marginal difference between megamart and slow/local/organic is a much closer and more nuanced set of trade-offs but that’s a tougher discussion to have and neither side can claim outright victory.
At the boring, ordinary local megamart you can buy real meat/fish/poultry/produce, often discounted through sales and coupons. It works on a budget and can provide good health/nutrition but it lacks the sex appeal of tilling your own soil or carbon footprint bragging rights.
Wednesday ~ October 13th, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Ryan Vann
Subsistence gardens? Not likely. Supplement gardens? Definitely, especially if the reafer is legalized. I suspect the wee bit o aquaponics I did back in high school could provide for decent additional income