I was going to write up a post on my exasperation at the Fed’s recent meeting statement, but Ezra Klein got to it before me and did a good job, so you should go read what he has to say. One point that I want to highlight, because I have made the point that the dual mandate is mostly just an insiders joke:
Paragraph two: We admit everything is terrible. In fact, it’s so terrible that it means we’re failing our mandate. “Measures of underlying inflation are currently at levels somewhat below those the Committee judges most consistent, over the longer run, with its mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability. With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to remain subdued for some time before rising to levels the Committee considers consistent with its mandate.”

[Image Courtesy of David Beckworth]
How many of you wish that you had a job where you could consistently fail at the very time when it is clutch that you deliver in a big way? How many of you would like to say, “Well, I have a model of the economy that says we won’t be hitting any of our own targets…but oh well”? The Federal Reserve is in the exact position in the economy where they can act quickly and decisively and actually make a large impact on nominal spending. I would even go as far as to say that they can do so without “long and variable lags”, as markets should price in actions by the Fed nearly immediately, and indeed they have been.
Contrary to the popular narrative, I believe that it is this very passivity by the Fed that brought us to the brink in the fall of 2008, when every indicator of economic activity (industrial output, consumer spending, business confidence, NGDP expectations, etc.) were found to be in sudden free-fall mode. At that time, interest rates were in the 1.5%-2% range, and the Fed’s target was still 2% until October 2008!
And here we are, fully two years later, and we still cannot get the Fed to act…nor can we get the executive branch of government to take the problem seriously! This inaction belies an institution that either is ill-equipped to respond when necessary, or is structured in a way that prevents decisive action. Since I believe that the Fed has all the tools it needs (it being a monetary superpower), I would place the blame on the structure of the network.
There is nothing more important on the Fed’s plate right now than bringing nominal spending back in line with the previous trajectory of NGDP. Not only to assist 50 million people who are currently unemployed, and help numerous others rebuild their balance sheets…but to save our economy from the whims of populist sentiment that will likely take hold if our economic malaise continues for very much longer. That means rounds and rounds of fiscal stimulus. That means the development of an entire class of freeters who never reach full potential. And most importantly, that means the loss of real goods and services that could otherwise be produced in our economy — which translates into a lower real standard of living for everyone.
At this point I would do anything for a little more monetary stimulus.

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Tuesday ~ September 21st, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Johnnie Linn
There is nothing on the Fed’s plate right now that is more important than not to put more complexity into a market that is in a holding pattern to see what the results of the mid-term elections will be, followed by a holding pattern to see what the lame-duck Congress will do.
I predict that the economy will show some more consistent signs of strengthening between now and the elections, that the Dems can take credit for, and the whims of populist sentiment might take hold a little less. A big move by the Fed just now would stir up, not quiet, those whims of populist sentiment.
Tuesday ~ September 21st, 2010 at 10:08 pm
Edwin Perello
Niklas, you like conspiracy theories for a good chuckle. I’m still leaning towards a more political Fed. Perhaps not the big man himself; but the rest of the board? Most conspiracy theories fall face first on the illogical suggestion thousands of people are behind something. This just takes a few staring down a barrel full of fish and declaring it’s got nothing to offer the starving children.
Wednesday ~ September 22nd, 2010 at 11:12 am
Jim MacDonald
I would be interested to know what exactly you mean by fiscal stimulus. Do you mean QE2? The quantitative easing that the Fed has undertaken thus far has had no effect on anything but goosing the stock market and helping increase bonuses for Wall Street.
I would be all for government spending on useful things like infrastructure (roads, water lines, sewer lines, upgraded electrical transmission lines, etc, etc.), but I am completely opposed to simply ‘printing’ money when there is no aggregate demand for loans from either businesses or individuals.
Thursday ~ September 23rd, 2010 at 7:53 pm
Benjamin "Monetary Bull" Cole
I like the expression “Do Nothing” Fed. Also, the “Japan Wing” of the Fed, when referring to the do-nothing crowd.
For those who support QE, I think the words “Mpnetary Bulls” should be adopted. In American politics, you never want to accept words such as “easy,” “dove” or “soft” to describe your position.
So, you are not “soft on inflation,” you are a “monetary bull.” “Bull” connotes strength and optimism, and rising markets. Use it!
If you want to have some fun, read the Wall Street Journal editorial by Richard Fisher, Dallas Fed President, that he has been rendered impotent by Obama’s left-wing economic constructs.
This was a particularly injudicious bit of writing. Fisher said that due to Obama’s reg and tax policies, monetary expansionism would just lead to inflation, but no growth–-an incredibly corrosive affirmation of institutional impotence.
I wonder how Ben Bernanke responds when he has Fed regional presidents publicly stating there is nothing the Fed can do to boost output. This is precisely the wonrg message to send, when the public needs optimism and a belief that output can go up.
Write a letter to Fisher and Bernanke asking if that is really what Fisher meant to say–the Fed at this point can only cause inflation, and that because of recent tax and reg changes–not the piles of regs and taxes there before, or taxes and regs in the 50 states, but just this last batch of Obama’s.
There are right-wingers out there, at the AEI and George Mason, calling for QE. We need to build bridges to them.