Another chart to steal from Real Time Economics, this time provided by Justin Lahart.

The classic hydraulic macro story would imply that someone is hoarding cash. It would be really nice then if we could look around and see some cash being hoarded. Indeed, we do.
A point I want to make is that none of these pieces of evidence is in-and-of itself conclusive: The small business survey, the flow of funds, inflation expectations, etc.
There could be explanations for all of them that involve something other than the traditional liquidity demand story: that is that recessions are caused by excess demand in the market for cash/bonds/safety.
However, the liquidity demand story suggests that certain things should all be happening at the same time: a decline in the demand for labor, a decline in the purchase of durables, a decline in consumer prices and business’s pricing power, a decline in asset prices, a decline in inflation expectations, an increase in cash holdings, an increase in the ease of finding workers, etc.
And, all of those things are happening.
I like to focus on inflation because I think just about all of us have agreed that inflation is primarily controlled by actions at the Fed. Thus close patterns between inflation and other variables should suggest that they are also controlled by the Fed.
Here is fraction of income spent on durables and inflation.
Ed Leamer likes to say that its all durables and housing. I think there is more going on in housing than money creation but lets check the Leamer story versus inflation.
Looking at durables only suggests that inflation might flatten out soon. Looking at durables and new houses suggests that deflation will be upon us for sure. It will be interesting to see what happens.
Note, however, that this is not saying that a reduction in income spent on durables and housing will cause a decline in inflation. Its saying the Fed has already taken certain actions. The immediate result of those actions is a decline the fraction of income spent on durables and new houses. The future impact of those same actions will be a decline in inflation.
In other words the inflation decline is already baked in. What we have to ask ourselves now is whether we want to take actions that would raise inflation expectations for the medium future.

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Monday ~ September 20th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
David Beckworth
Karl:
Along these lines, I have put up two figures showing the latest Cleveland Fed inflation expectation figures. Not good.</a
Monday ~ September 20th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Johnnie Linn
Why not let the Fed do what it is equipped to do? When people were afraid, and wanted to hold on to more money, the Fed made more money available. When people stop being afraid, and want to let some money loose, the Fed will soak up money again.
Right now the Fed is in the role of compost pile, midden, Skonk Works. Dead and decaying assets have been thrown in, are being decomposed by maggots and other creatures that do that sort of work, and at the appropriate time, will be put back outside. The Fed will need to reflate the money supply only by the amount needed to offset the gains it made in holding the assets.
Monday ~ September 20th, 2010 at 3:38 pm
Lord
How would you distinguish an increased desire for liquidity from a decreased desire for debt? Liquidity cause from effect?