Reading Kerry Howley’s wonderful piece on cryogenics has me thinking about the conflicts and tensions between life-extending science and religion. It occurs to me that if the progress of science and the treatment of disease and aging ever advances to the point where humans can live forever, it will create a paradox whereby heaven is an impossibility for most believers.
The problem is that in most religions suicide is a very serious sin, and life saving medical treatments should not be refused unless they present undue suffering or burden. See Catechism 2278, for instance. This presents the paradox for believers: the only way to go to heaven is to die, but the only way to die is to commit a sin that prevents you from going to heaven.
How can you die without sinning in a world where immortality is an option? It’s likely that some forms of death would be untreatable, like being exploded so badly that only dust remains. You could simply increase your odds of dying by taking extremely dangerous careers or hobbies that puts you in a high probability of sudden, irreversible, and perhaps explosive, death. The subsequent large supply of labor and low wages in risky industries will mean it’s even easier for non-believers to avoid death.
Maybe the future will see a rise in religious terrorists who target science in an attempt to prevent us from ever achieving immortality. These martyrs would prevent the paradox from occurring, and thus save billions of souls from being locked out of heaven. From the believers perspective, that is a much greater thing to achieve for God than anything todays terrorists seek to accomplish.
Another potential outcome is that people will abandon religion altogether. After all, without the possibility of the reward of a heavenly afterlife, much of the promise of religion goes away. Immortality also allows the avoidance of hell, and so much of the threat of religion goes away as well.
Or perhaps the option of immortality will lead to a rise in the popularity of religions like Christian Science and Jehovah’s Witnesses for whom medical treatments are themselves the sins.
This is one good reason for believers to avoid cryogenics: die now, while you still can.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Saturday ~ July 10th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Edwin Perello
Sentence of the year:
“This is one good reason for believers to avoid cryogenics: die now, while you still can.”
Saturday ~ July 10th, 2010 at 9:16 pm
Funky J
This is the dilemma faced by John Constantine in the movie/comic Constantine.
He manages to secure his place in heaven by sending demons back to hell, and then sacrificing himself for another.
Of course, like the Bible and other religious texts, the story of Constantine is simply make believe, and should never be taken seriously.
Saturday ~ July 10th, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Eric Crampton
Why not just predict a rise in millennialist Christianity? They live forever, until the rapture.
Sunday ~ July 11th, 2010 at 7:06 am
rjs
gonna get pretty crowded if everyone lives forever…
Sunday ~ July 11th, 2010 at 10:59 am
jazzbumpa
Maybe the future will see a rise in religious terrorists who target science in an attempt to prevent us from ever achieving immortality.
I was going to say this looks like the plot of a really awful Sci-Fi novel , and it’s a good thing L. Ron Hubbard is already dead, but Funky kinda scooped me.
The way out is very simple – pretend to be a heretic. Then the religious fanatics/terrorists will execute you, thinking they are sending you to hell.
They never stop to think that murder is a mortal sin.
Oh, well . . .
JzB
Sunday ~ July 11th, 2010 at 12:39 pm
Lazarus
He ascended into heaven,
And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty;
From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
It shouldn’t be a big problem for Christians. They already know that judgement will come like a thief in the night, and so on, however long they live. (Note that most early Christians expected Christ to return before their natural deaths, for example.)
It’s more of a problem for Buddhists perhaps. Actual, functioning personal immortality? Something of a challenge to a tradition that says that the very idea of stable personhood is an illusion, created by ceaseless change and the karmic flux of the universe. (Although again, you can achieve enlightenment even when alive – so perhaps you can when immortal.)