In order to raise money and improve the city’s health the Mayor of Philadelphia is proposing what appears to be the country’s largest tax on sugary drinks. The tax will be 2 cents per ounce, which is double New York City’s soda tax, and over 32 times Pennsylvania’s beer tax. It will cover a wide range of sugary drinks including soda, iced tea, energy drinks and chocolate milk. Being careful not to leave any loopholes, the tax will also cover drink syrups and powders, but it does avoid taxing diet sodas and baby formula.
You’ve got to give the administration credit, they’ve dotted all their i’s and crossed all their t’s in designing this tax. If this were coming from our federal government it would include tons of distortionary loopholes, probably accidently apply to insulin, and also include an extension of the alternative minimum tax.
The below image, from the Philadelphia Inquirer, shows how this will translate into taxes for a handful of drinks:


4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ March 5th, 2010 at 1:12 am
RickRussellTX
This just in:
Alcoholism skyrockets among Philadelphia teens; mayor’s office is mystified
Friday ~ March 5th, 2010 at 9:48 am
drscroogemcduck
the concerning thing is that almost half the money raised will be spent on programs to encourage healthier eating. i thought the science showed that these programs were useless.
Friday ~ March 5th, 2010 at 4:53 pm
Income, Taxes, and Value Neutrality
[...] reading this post by Adam Ozimek on Philly’s proposed soda tax, it occurred to me that the fact that taxes on soda and cigarettes seem paternalistic while taxes [...]
Thursday ~ April 22nd, 2010 at 7:46 am
They came first for the sugar, then they came for the salt… « Modeled Behavior
[...] in area B. This type of slipper slope is evident in the spread of regulation from sugar, which is becoming more popular, to salt, which is on the horizon: Citing 40 years of failed efforts to voluntarily reduce the [...]