<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Innovation as a Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dupe Deluxe: The Sucker&#8217;s Market for Financial Innovation &#171; Generation Bubble</title>
		<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dupe Deluxe: The Sucker&#8217;s Market for Financial Innovation &#171; Generation Bubble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modeledbehavior.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8212; might be regarded as evidence of tacit collusion among suppliers. But in this post, Karl Smith argues that such complexity is not evidence of collusion but constraint, echoing the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; might be regarded as evidence of tacit collusion among suppliers. But in this post, Karl Smith argues that such complexity is not evidence of collusion but constraint, echoing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random, 10/2 &#171; Rortybomb</title>
		<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Random, 10/2 &#171; Rortybomb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modeledbehavior.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We partially won over Karl Smith when it comes to vanilla products. Hooray! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We partially won over Karl Smith when it comes to vanilla products. Hooray! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Investment Bank Profits Persist &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Investment Bank Profits Persist &#124; Reaction Radio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modeledbehavior.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/financial-innovation-as-a-tax/#comment-533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] One of the odder riddles of the financial markets is how they can be so highly competitive and so highly profitable at the same time. The financial innovation debate seems to be helping us find an answer, as clearly articulated by Karl Smith: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the odder riddles of the financial markets is how they can be so highly competitive and so highly profitable at the same time. The financial innovation debate seems to be helping us find an answer, as clearly articulated by Karl Smith: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

