<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Shut Down A Bank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/06/23/how-to-shut-down-a-bank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/06/23/how-to-shut-down-a-bank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can better regulation survive a George Bush &#38; his appointees? &#171; Entitled to an Opinion</title>
		<link>http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/06/23/how-to-shut-down-a-bank/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can better regulation survive a George Bush &#38; his appointees? &#171; Entitled to an Opinion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/06/23/how-to-rescue-a-bank/#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] June 27, 2009 Can better regulation survive a George Bush &amp; his&#160;appointees? Posted by teageegeepea under Uncategorized Leave a Comment&#160;  William Black makes a point I&#8217;ve often tried to make to liberals. Of course his solution is just to ban certain kinds of market transactions. I&#8217;m reminded of an old post at Post-Austrian Economics (unfortunately removed from the web) where a sort of public-choice challenge was made to Paul Davidson over how the government could expect to handle such complexities and unexpected events in markets, and I think his conclusion was similar. Black also seems to agree with Sailer on &#8220;too-big-to-fail&#8220;. Megan McArdle &amp; Noam Scheiber distinguish between the hazards of size &amp; complexity/interconnectedness here, and Karl Smith chides them on the difficulty of dismantling failed banks here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 27, 2009 Can better regulation survive a George Bush &amp; his&nbsp;appointees? Posted by teageegeepea under Uncategorized Leave a Comment&nbsp;  William Black makes a point I&#8217;ve often tried to make to liberals. Of course his solution is just to ban certain kinds of market transactions. I&#8217;m reminded of an old post at Post-Austrian Economics (unfortunately removed from the web) where a sort of public-choice challenge was made to Paul Davidson over how the government could expect to handle such complexities and unexpected events in markets, and I think his conclusion was similar. Black also seems to agree with Sailer on &#8220;too-big-to-fail&#8220;. Megan McArdle &amp; Noam Scheiber distinguish between the hazards of size &amp; complexity/interconnectedness here, and Karl Smith chides them on the difficulty of dismantling failed banks here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

